Level 45
1 day < 1 min
LeaderboardGuest · Log in
Key point 4 of 8 · Indigenous American Philosophical Traditions
Estimated reading time: 2 min

Buen Vivir/Sumak Kawsay as an Alternative to Development

Sumak Kawsay, a Kichwa (Ecuadorian Quechua) phrase usually translated "living well" or "life in fullness," and its Aymara counterpart Suma Qamaña, denote an Andean ethical ideal in which a good life is measured not by individual material accumulation but by harmonious, reciprocal relations among community members, other living beings, and Pachamama. Ecuadorian intellectuals, most prominently the economist Alberto Acosta, who presided over Ecuador's 2007–2008 Constituent Assembly, and the Uruguayan researcher Eduardo Gudynas of the Latin American Center for Social Ecology (CLAES), translated this ideal into the Spanish political concept of Buen Vivir and promoted it explicitly as a "post-development" or "post-extractivist" alternative to conventional, GDP-growth-centered development theory, arguing that the latter had failed to deliver either ecological sustainability or genuine well-being across Latin America.

Food for thought

Why do you think there's historiographical debate about "Buen Vivir/Sumak Kawsay as an Alternative to Development"?