Nozick's Entitlement Theory and Libertarian Critique of Rawls
Robert Nozick, Rawls's colleague in the Harvard philosophy department, published Anarchy, State, and Utopia in 1974 (Basic Books) as a direct philosophical challenge to A Theory of Justice, defending a libertarian alternative grounded in individual rights rather than patterned distributive outcomes. Nozick's "entitlement theory" holds that a distribution of holdings is just if it arose through a history of legitimate steps: a principle of justice in acquisition, governing how unowned resources may first become someone's property; a principle of justice in transfer, governing how holdings may be voluntarily exchanged, given, or bequeathed; and a principle of rectification, addressing how to correct past violations of the first two principles, including historical injustices such as theft, fraud, or conquest.
Why do you think "Nozick's Entitlement Theory and Libertarian Critique of Rawls" was significant in this period?