Frozen Conflicts and Divided States
A number of territories around the world function, in practice, as independent states — with their own governments, currencies, security forces, and control over defined territory — while lacking wide international recognition. Political scientists commonly describe these as de facto states, and the unresolved disputes that produced them, often stalled since a ceasefire ended active fighting decades ago without a final political settlement, as frozen conflicts. These situations combine effective, on-the-ground statehood with contested legal status, and they tend to persist for long periods because none of the parties involved has the will or the power to change the underlying military and political balance.
Why do you think there's historiographical debate about "Frozen Conflicts and Divided States"?