Sugar, Coffee, Tea, and Chocolate
Sugar cane, native to New Guinea and Southeast Asia, had already spread across the Mediterranean and the Atlantic islands, including Madeira and the Canary Islands, before Columbus's voyages, where Portuguese and Spanish planters had begun experimenting with cane cultivation using enslaved and coerced labor. Columbus carried sugar cane to the Caribbean in 1493, and within a few decades Spanish and Portuguese colonizers had established sugar plantations in Hispaniola, and above all in Brazil, where the Portuguese crown granted land concessions for cane cultivation from the 1530s onward. Sugar production required enormous capital investment in mills (engenhos) and large, disciplined labor forces to manage the labor-intensive, time-sensitive process of cutting and processing cane before it spoiled. This combination of high capital requirements, an intensive production process, and a lucrative export market gave rise to the plantation system: large, single-crop agricultural estates organized around forced labor and oriented entirely toward supplying distant European markets, a model later extended to tobacco, cotton, coffee, and other tropical commodities across the Americas.
Why do you think there's historiographical debate about "Sugar, Coffee, Tea, and Chocolate"?