Cultural, Economic, and Informal Governance Forums
The Commonwealth of Nations and the Organisation internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) are the two most prominent examples of international organizations built around a shared colonial-era language and history rather than geographic proximity. The Commonwealth traces its institutional origins to the 1926 Imperial Conference, whose Balfour Declaration described Britain and its self-governing dominions as "autonomous communities...equal in status," a status given legal effect by the 1931 Statute of Westminster; the 1949 London Declaration then allowed newly independent republics such as India, independent since 1947, to remain members while recognizing the British monarch only as "Head of the Commonwealth." Today it comprises 56 member states, mostly former British territories, though it has admitted countries with no colonial link to Britain, such as Mozambique (1995) and Rwanda (2009), and it has periodically suspended members, including Fiji, Pakistan, and Zimbabwe, over coups or breaches of democratic governance. La Francophonie grew out of a movement led in the 1960s by post-colonial African leaders, most prominently Senegal's Léopold Sédar Senghor, who saw the French language as a basis for cooperation among culturally diverse states; its institutional core was founded by the 1970 Niamey Convention and renamed the OIF in 1998, headquartered in Paris. Unlike the Commonwealth's basis in a single former empire, the OIF's membership spans countries as varied as France, Quebec, numerous West and Central African states, Vietnam, and Egypt, illustrating how linguistic-cultural ties can cut across other regional and political groupings.
Why do you think there's historiographical debate about "Cultural, Economic, and Informal Governance Forums"?